MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323661228 · doi:10.33137/ic.v12i.40489

Remembering Emilio Goggio

2023· article· en· W4323661228 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julius A. Molinaro

Bibliographic record

VenueItalian Canadiana · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My remarks are limited to personal reminiscences of ProfessorEmilio Goggio and include background information provided by the members of his family.His name was well known to me even before I was admitted into the University of Toronto as a first year student many years ago My father, who in the thirties was parttime correspondent for // Progresso Italo-Americano of New York, often mentioned his name in connection with events taking place in the Italian community.In that capacity he had ample opportunity to get to know Professor Goggio who was often invited to speak to various groups in the community.His tall commanding presence combined with the gift of communicating with great facility won a special place for him within and beyond the university.He was held in the highest regard by the Italian community which he represented on occasions of great importance.His name is mentioned in many articles in // Progresso Italo-Americano.I first became acquainted with Professor Goggio as a student in his Spanish grammar class and discovered how tolerant and understanding with students he could be.I used to sit in the Spanish class next to Johnny Wayne, who later became one of Canada's famous comedians as a partner in the Wayne and Shuster team.We had gone to the same high school together.Being a very busy actor and comedian and always in demand, Johnny would sometimes come to class without having his homework prepared.During the class Professor Goggio would give each student a turn to read his translation of an English sentence into Spanish.When it was Johnny's turn, he would casually look at my notebook and read what I had written.Professor Goggio looked down at us both with a knowing look, and with a twinkle in his eye would call on the next student, without comment.Sometime in the spring of 1937 when I was a second year student at the University of Toronto, my father received a telephone call from Professor Goggio informing him that 1 had won a trip to Italy offered by the Italian Government.A short time later to celebrate the event,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItalian CanadianaSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207