Bibliographic record
Abstract
Very few avenues of public life were open to women at the beginning of this century and therefore as a background to our topic, it is necessary to recall important events which will help us to place it in the right historical perspective.In 1882, in Ontario, unmarried women with property qualifications were granted the right to vote on municipal bylaws only.In 1884, a motion to admit women into the University of Toronto was also passed: it took effect in 1886! exactly thirty three years after Dr. James Forneri had introduced Modern Languages, including Italian, in the same institution.These milestones in the suffrage movement were not without strong opposition and controversy in high quarters.A contention which carried great weight in the eighties and nineties was that woman suffrage was contrary to biblical teachings.A fervent exponent of this view was the Hon.John Dryden, Ontario Minister of Agriculture in 1893.Attacking a proposed suffrage measure then before the legislature, Dryden quoted Scripture: "The man was not made for woman, but the woman for the man" and again "Thy desire shall be to thy husband and he shall rule over thee."From these and other quotations, he concluded that woman's place was to be in submission to man.Even more terrifying than flying in the face of biblical teachings was the fear of many, including women that enfranchisement "would unsex and degrade women, destroy domestic harmony, and lead to a decline in the birth rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".