Bibliographic record
Abstract
The story has been told thousands of times.A young woman leaves her small village in northern Italy, says goodbye to her parents and sisters and wonders if she will ever see them again.She travels alone across the Atlantic by boat and lands in New York.Then she travels by train to somewhere in Canada, perhaps Toronto, perhaps Montreal, Sault Ste Marie, or Windsor.She must have been frightened and apprehensive but also full of hopes and dreams about what this new land would offer her and her future family.She arrives here and speaks not a word of English.She believes her fiance when he tells her that the justice of the peace conducting the wedding ceremony is really a Canadian priest.She was probably unaware that demographically she was in the middle of the first major wave of immigration from Italy into Canada, which occurred at the turn of the century.By 1915 over 14 million Italians had left Italy.The destination of choice was North America where immigrants often worked in the mines or in construction.For them as for other immigrant groups family, the church, and paesani formed the crux of their lives as they worked hard and saved to own their homes and build their communities.Concurrently with the development of their community ties, they also developed strong ties to Canada.That is what made the dreaded events of 1940 so difficult to accept.On 10 June 1940, the notorious order in council was issued under the authority of The War Measures Act.Civil rights were suspended while men in the community were interned for no crime but their continued or perceived ties to Italy.This single act, more than any other, entrenched the stigma that attached to immigrant families and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".