MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323764167 · doi:10.1017/9781580467179.001

Foreword

2008· other· en· W4323764167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European national history
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSymphonyPianoMusicalVisual artsChamber musicConjunction (astronomy)Art historyArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The international symposium at which some of the chapters in this volume were first vetted was part of a major musical festival mounted by what was then the Canadian Centre for Austrian and Central European Studies, and is now the Wirth Institute Centre for Austrian and Central European Studies of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada. Presented in seven concerts over four days in June 2002, the event was the first major music festival devoted entirely to the nineteenthcentury Austrian composer and teacher, Carl Czerny (1791–1857). Our Institute's project was undertaken in conjunction with the Society of the Friends of Music of Vienna, the Francis Winspear Centre for Music in Edmonton, and the Edmonton Symphony Orchestra. The Carl Czerny Music Festival was under the overall artistic direction of the internationally renowned Austrian-Canadian pianist, Anton Kuerti. Kuerti, widely considered to be among the world's foremost interpreters of Czerny's piano music, also performed as a soloist and as a participant in several of the chamber music ensembles. Czerny—the student of Beethoven and the teacher of Liszt—is known to generations of piano students as the composer of innumerable etudes, studies, and technical exercises that have been used for almost two centuries as aids to learning. What few people realize, however, is that Czerny was an important composer in his own right. Some of his nonpedagogical works, which have only recently come to light, have fascinated and astonished music critics. As a result, it is now increasingly clear that Czerny did not lack for invention, craft, or emotion; that he is, in fact, an unjustly neglected major late Classical and early Romantic composer. Some of Czerny's most impressive compositions, however, were never published, and it was for this reason that our institute, together with Kuerti and the director of the Archive of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde in Wien, Otto Biba, selected a series of unpublished Czerny manuscripts for world premiere performances at the festival. These included the Violin Sonata in A Major from 1807, five unpublished songs (including Czerny's version of “Der Erlkönig”) from 1811–12, the Overture in E Major from 1838, the Mass in C Major from 1839, the String Quartet in E Minor from 1850, and the Symphony in G Minor from 1854.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCentral European national historyFrench-language works237,207