Bibliographic record
Abstract
The peculiarly 'real and realistic' Italian tradition has bestowed upon the Italian cineastes' works continuous admiration and success with audiences and critics alike.One of the reasons may be found in the opinion expressed by writer and film critic Andr Bazin.In the chapter entitled "De Sica metteur-en-scne" (61-78) of his Qu'est-ce que le cinma?Bazin speaks of the originality of Italian neorealism, which compared with other chief schools of innovative cinema such as the Soviet Cinema, never made "reality the servant of some a priori point of view" (Bazin 64).From the 1940s to the end of the 1980s the renown Italian realist tradition has been a much discussed subject, both at the journalistic and scholarly level, and just as Italian cinema has been slowly taking on new forms,!the question of reality and realism has re-emerged at the end of the twentieth and beginning of the twenty-first centuries and has become once again a topical issue of debate.The purpose of this paper is to provide a self-reflexive discussion of my film A Self-conscious Mise-en-scne, an experimental film shot on approximately 3300 feet of 16mm black and white Kodak film 7222 100DXN455,2 against both the backdrop of realism as a theoretical approach and the practice of experimental filmmaking in a broader sense.As a Canadian filmmaker, born in Italy and educated both in Italy and Canada, I share many traits of the Italian realist cinematic tradition, yet,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".