MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323789566 · doi:10.33137/ic.v30i.39483

Sei Brava

2022· article· it· W4323789566 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Darlene Madott

Bibliographic record

VenueItalian Canadiana · 2022
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Darlene MadottSei brava, Signora.Hai coraggio.The praise was from an old man, to mea woman, cycling in Sardegna, in the company of mostly men.But I took it as approval of my life's journey, in particular, the courage it takes to create.The writing.Who would have thought?That every encounter with the blank page would take such courage.I went into the study of law because of a writer's block.I had to find a way of being in the world.I thought, if I cannot write, let me do something useful, something that will consume hours like fire to human hair, make writing impossible, or make me forget about writing.I experienced long periods of silence.The silence when I was becoming a lawyer, becoming a mother, trying to transform myself, to leave the need to write behind.In becoming a lawyer, I initially felt I had betrayed myself, breaking faith with that which I had most wanted to pursue.Ironically, I also found, in placing this legal girdle upon the mind, a personal freedom.It was as if I travelled in disguise.Ultimately, it is far easier to obey something external than an internal imperative.Yet, in forcing that discipline upon myself, proving that I could do it, there was a strange and subversive right to pursue the self-under cover.Becoming a mother-painful as birthing stories.With motherhood, I also experienced a loss of control, a helplessness as the child grew and necessarily took his own mysterious directions.Through my late twenties and thirties, I wrote, if at all, in the margins of life and "real" work.My publications occurred, almost by surprise-in fact, the way I gave birth to my one, only son.Making Olives and Other Family Secrets, my fifth publication, was the book that made the difference in my writing career.I went from being the "good little aspiring writer" to the writer who now half the family wanted to sue.She's a loose cannon.Who knows what she'll say, next?"You ought to be ashamed of yourself," wrote my cousin Bob, not long after its publication: "You have managed to insult your parents, family and relatives with your book.You have insulted my parents and immediate family.You-a lawyer!To consider if there were any legal implications should have been enough to change the direction of your story.What bothers me most is, where did you get the information from?" 228

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3640.250

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItalian CanadianaSame topicEducational and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207