MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323789585 · doi:10.33137/ic.v30i.39484

Sisters / The Second Coming / When One Sings One Thinks No Wrong (Italian Proverb)

2022· article· en· W4323789585 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mary Melfi

Bibliographic record

VenueItalian Canadiana · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ever since I watched the sun and the moon undress the sky of its colour, ever since I could tell the difference between a "him" and a "her," ever since I could define the line between a "me" and a "you" and protect myself accordingly, I longed for a sister.Ever since I understood I was an accident (or, as Mother would say, "a surprise"), ever since I knew I came into the world dangling on a string, a joker sans joke, ever since I sensed the world is teaming with lonesome travellers and pleasureseekers sans purpose I longed for a sister.Ever since I was singled out and ostracized because my eyes were the wrong colour (Or was it my hair that was all wrong?), ever since I was left out in the cold, refused membership in a club or been un-invited to a party I longed for a sister to comfort me, tell me an injustice had been done-I was good enough.Ever since I managed to override feelings of self-pity and betrayal, ever since I managed to entertain friends and lovers foolishly smiling, ever since the spectacle (all smiles) guaranteed success (yes, I could fit in!), I wished for a sister, a blood relative, who accepted me as I was-smiles, or no smiles.Ever since I understood the medicinal effects wild flowers had on moods, I understood I could never be healed no matter how

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItalian CanadianaSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207