Cytomegalovirus Infection Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes Among Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis, which is associated with adverse outcomes. Similar studies in pediatric IBD patients are lacking. Methods: We analyzed non-overlapping years of National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and Kids Inpatient Database (KID) between 2003 and 2016. We included all patients < 21 years with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients with coexisting CMV infection during that admission were compared with patients without CMV infection for outcome measures such as in-hospital mortality, disease severity, and healthcare resource utilization. Results: We analyzed a total of 254,839 IBD-related hospitalizations. The overall prevalence rate of CMV infection was 0.3% with an overall increasing prevalence trend, P < 0.001. Approximately two-thirds of patients with CMV infection had UC, which was associated with almost 3.6 times increased risk of CMV infection (confidence interval (CI): 3.11 to 4.31, P < 0.001). IBD patients with CMV had more comorbid conditions. CMV infection was significantly associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR): 3.58; CI: 1.85 to 6.93, P < 0.001) and severe IBD (OR: 3.31; CI: 2.54 to 4.32, P < 0.001). CMV-related IBD hospitalizations had increased length of stay by 9 days while incurring almost $65,000 higher hospitalization charges, P < 0.001. Conclusions: The prevalence of CMV infection is increasing in pediatric IBD patients. CMV infections significantly corelated with increased risk of mortality and severity of IBD leading to prolonged hospital stay and higher hospitalization charges. Further prospective studies are needed to better understand the factors leading to this increasing CMV infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".