MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323822038 · doi:10.1097/mph.0000000000002656

Precursor B-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma in Children: Hacettepe Experience

2023· article· en· W4323822038 on OpenAlexaff
Hilal Susam Şen, Bilgehan Yalçın, Dıclehan Orhan, Burça Aydın, Nilgün Kurucu, Ali Varan, Ayşegül Üner, Tezer Kutluk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphoblastic lymphomaLymphomaStage (stratigraphy)Internal medicineIncidence (geometry)B symptomsNeutropeniaDiseaseBone marrowFebrile neutropeniaGastroenterologySurgeryPediatricsChemotherapyImmunologyT cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the study was to review the clinical and pathologic characteristics and treatment results of children with precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Of 530 children diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphomas between 2000 and 2021, 39 (7.4%) were identified as having precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Clinical characteristics, pathologic, radiologic, laboratory data, treatments, responses, and overall outcomes were recorded from hospital files and analyzed. The median age of 39 patients (males/females, 23/16) was 8.3 years (range 1.3 to 16.1). The most common sites of involvement were the lymph nodes. At a median follow-up of 55.8 months, 14 patients (35%) had a recurrence of disease (11 stage IV, 3 stage III); 4 were in complete remission with salvage therapies, 9 died of progressive disease and one died due to febrile neutropenia. Five-year event-free survival and overall survival rates were 65.4% and 78.3% for all cases, respectively. Survival rates were higher in patients with a complete remission at the end of induction therapies. The survival rates were lower in our study compared with other studies, which could be explained by the high relapse rate and higher incidence of advanced-stage disease due to bone marrow involvement. We demonstrated a prognostic impact of treatment response at the end of the induction phase. Cases with a disease relapse have poor prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/OncologySame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207