All-metal cavity antenna with light weight, high efficiency and circular polarization for satellite platform applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, a lightweight high-efficiency circularly polarized (CP) all-metal antenna design method is presented for satellite industry applications. The proposed antenna is composed of a rectangular waveguide feeder, a high-order mode cavity and a metasurface circular polarizer (MCP). The cavity high-order mode TE 440 is directly excited by four coupling slots in the waveguide. The MCP is placed on the cavity to generate the CP radiation. Due to the introduction of high-order mode technology and MCP, all metal walls inside the antenna can be removed, which are necessary in conventional waveguide structures, and weight is thereby significantly reduced. To reflect the weight advantage, a conventional metal wall-loaded waveguide antenna of the same size is designed. The measured results show that the proposed antenna has wider impedance and axial ratio bandwidths, and higher radiation efficiency. In particular, the proposed antenna is 40% lighter than the comparative one, indicating that it is more applicable to satellite platforms with limited loading capacities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".