Guide to anomaly-mediated supersymmetry-breaking QCD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a careful study of the chiral symmetry breaking minima and the baryonic directions in supersymmetric QCD ($SU({N}_{c})$ with ${N}_{f}$ flavors) perturbed by anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking (AMSB). For the s-confining case of ${N}_{f}={N}_{c}+1$ and most of the free-magnetic phase (${N}_{f}\ensuremath{\le}1.43{N}_{c}$) we find that naive tree level baryonic runaways are stabilized by loop effects. Runaways are present, however, for the upper end of the free magnetic phase (${N}_{f}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}1.43{N}_{c}$) and into conformal window, signaling the existence of incalculable minima at large field values of $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}})$. Nevertheless, the chiral symmetry breaking points are locally stable, and are expected to continuously connect to the vacua of QCD for large SUSY breaking. The case of ${N}_{f}={N}_{c}$ requires particular care due to the inherently strongly coupled nature of the quantum modified moduli space. Due to the incalculability of critical K\"ahler potential terms, the stability of the chiral symmetry breaking point along baryonic directions cannot be determined for ${N}_{f}={N}_{c}$. With the exception of this case, all theories to which AMSB can be applied (${N}_{f}<3{N}_{c}$) possess stable chiral symmetry breaking minima, and all theories with ${N}_{f}\ensuremath{\lesssim}1.43{N}_{c}$ (aside from ${N}_{f}={N}_{c}$) are protected from runaways to incalculable minima.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".