MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323838275 · doi:10.3847/psj/acbdfe

Observational Characterization of Main-belt Comet and Candidate Main-belt Comet Nuclei

2023· article· en· W4323838275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Planetary Science Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersPlanetary Science Division
KeywordsPhysicsCometAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report observations of nine main-belt comets (MBCs) or candidate MBCs, most of which were obtained when the targets were apparently inactive. We find effective nucleus radii (assuming albedos of p V = 0.05 ± 0.02) of r n = (0.24 ± 0.05) km for 238P/Read, r n = (0.9 ± 0.2) km for 313P/Gibbs, r n = (0.6 ± 0.1) km for 324P/La Sagra, r n = (1.0 ± 0.2) km for 426P/PANSTARRS, r n = (0.5 ± 0.1) km for 427P/ATLAS, r n &lt; (0.3 ± 0.1) km for P/2016 J1-A (PANSTARRS), r n &lt; (0.17 ± 0.04) km for P/2016 J1-B (PANSTARRS), r n ≤ (0.5 ± 0.2) km for P/2017 S9 (PANSTARRS), recently redesignated 455P/PANSTARRS, and r n = (0.4 ± 0.1) km for P/2019 A3 (PANSTARRS). We identify evidence of activity in observations of 238P in 2021, and find similar inferred activity onset times and net initial mass-loss rates for 238P during perihelion approaches in 2010, 2016, and 2021. P/2016 J1-A and P/2016 J1-B are also found to be active in 2021 and 2022, making them collectively the tenth MBC confirmed to be recurrently active near perihelion and therefore likely to be exhibiting sublimation-driven activity. The nucleus of 313P is found to have colors of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo accent="false">′</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo accent="false">′</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.52</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo accent="false">′</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo accent="false">′</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.22</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.07</mml:mn> </mml:math> , consistent with 313P being a Lixiaohua family member. We also report nondetections of P/2015 X6 (PANSTARRS), where we conclude that its current nucleus size is likely below our detection limits ( r n ≲ 0.3 km). Lastly, we find that of 17 MBCs or candidate MBCs for which nucleus sizes (or inferred parent body sizes) have been estimated, &gt;80% have r n ≤ 1.0 km, pointing to an apparent physical preference toward small MBCs, where we suggest that Yarkovsky–O’Keefe–Radzievskii–Paddack spin-up may play a significant role in triggering and/or facilitating MBC activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it