Impact of Ligands on the Properties of Lanthanide Metal‐Organic Frameworks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A series of lanthanide metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) have been assembled with a series of functionalized [1,1′:4′,1′′‐terphenyl]‐4,4′′‐dicarboxylic acid ligands. The relationship between the ligand properties and the corresponding MOF properties has been studied. The structures of the MOFs depend on the solvent‐ligand and ligand‐ligand interactions, as well as the size of the non‐coordinating functional groups of the ligands. The differences in thermal stability among the ligands are inherited and amplified by corresponding lanthanide MOFs. The ligands bearing methyl, ether, and aldehyde functional groups are capable of sensitizing the emission from the lanthanide centers, whereas the ligand with α,β‐unsaturated ketone functional groups are non‐emissive due to the mismatch of the ligand and metal energy levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it