MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323875383 · doi:10.1017/9781846158148.010

Commentary

2010· other· en· W4323875383 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSermonLine (geometry)HistoryArtMathematicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 . Men þa leofestan, halie, soðlice : these words are added above the line in the same hand, but do not correspond to anything in the Latin source. Perhaps they were added to improve the introduction, making it sound more like the beginning of a sermon. 2 . BN lat. 12,270 (printed in Appendix I) states that the city was Armenia. BN lat. 12,270 and Letter A shorten the travels of the Sunday Letter considerably; compare the list at the beginning of Letter B. 3 . Whereas the Latin suggests that those present asked to understand the reasons for the letter's appearance, the Old English suggests that the letter itself states these reasons. In addition, the Old English translator does not connect its arrival on a Sunday with its message of Sunday observance as the Latin does. 4 . On sunnandæg … ofer eow : the list of restrictions generally follows BN lat. 12,270 but omits trade ( mercatum non facientes , Appendix I, line 12) which, in any case, seems superfluous with the following mention of buying and selling. The Old English also contains an item not in the Latin: the baking of bread. This prohibition is not a regular feature of Recension I, occurring only in the fifteenthcentury copy in Graz 248. It is, however, common in Recension II, as in Munich 9550 panem coxerit (Delehaye, ‘Note’, p. 179); cf. C99 bread bace , D60 hlafas bace , E165 hlaf baceð , F198 hlafes bakeþ ). The Penitential of Theodore also forbids the baking of bread (see Chapter 2, p. 29). For ofer eow (BN lat. 12,270 super nos ) see the Tarragona manuscript: super vos (Priebsch, Letter from Heaven , p. 35). 5 . Cf. Exodus XX.11. 6 . No other copies of Recension I have this comment. If the translator's Latin source had the sinful and righteous spending 5220 years in hell as does BN lat. 12,270, he is probably responsible for changing it to 5228. Ultimately, the 5228 figure goes back to discussions of the ages of the world found in various patristic and later medieval sources, including several Old English texts; Eusebius, for instance, assigns this number to the period from creation to Christ's preaching of the Sermon on the Mount; see H. Tristram, Sex aetates mundi: Die Weltzeitalter bei den Angelsachsen und den Iren: Untersuchungen u. Texte (Heidelberg, 1985), p. 22.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3880.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLinguistics and language evolutionFrench-language works237,207