MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323875520 · doi:10.1017/9781846158148.016

Manuscripts Containing Latin Versions of the Sunday Letter

2010· other· en· W4323875520 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacsimileFifteenthClassicsHistoryArtComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following is a list of all Latin versions of the Sunday Letter up to the fifteenth century which have been discovered thus far. Those marked with an asterisk have not been edited nor have I seen a facsimile. Within each recension they are ordered by date. A full accounting of the medieval Latin versions will no doubt find additional copies. Recension I [Vatican City, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Reg. lat. 49 (s. ix/x), 53r, extract ] [Vatican City, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Reg. lat. 852 (s. x), 6v] Basel, Universitätsbibliothek, B VII 7 (s. x), 1r London, BL Add. 19,725 (s. x/xi), 87v–88r Tarragona (Spain), Cathedral Library (s. xii?), transcript of a lost manuscript Paris, BN lat. 12,270 (s. xii), 31vb–32vb Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, 1355 (xiv/xv), 89r–90v, 1 of 2 letters Graz, Universitätsbibliothek, 248 (s. xv), 133rb–133va, 1 of 2 letters Recension II Paris, BN lat. 8508 (s. x1), 57v–63r, in margin Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, clm 9550 (s. xi), 1r London, BL Add. 30,853 (s. xi/xii), 231r–232v Todi, Perugia (s. xii?), transcript of a lost manuscript Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, 1878 (s. xii), 35v–36v Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, clm 14,673 (s. xii/xiii), 119v–120r, 1 of 2 letters Uppsala, Universitätsbibliothek, C212 (s. xiv), 1v–2v Budapest, University Library, lat. 39 (s. xiv/xv), 86vb–88r Einsiedeln, Stiftsbibliothek, 726 (s. xiv/xv), 124r Kremsmünster, Stiftsbibliothek, 283 (s. xiv/xv), 92v–93r London, BL Royal 11 B.x (s. xiv/xv), 184r Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, 1355 (s. xiv/xv), 91r–92r, 1 of 2 letters Bernkastel-Kues, Bibliothek des St. Nikolaus-Hospitals, 128 (s. xv), 129r, fragment *Fritzlar, Dombibliothek, 37 (s. xv), 178v–181v Hamburg, Bibliothek der Hansestadt, S. Petri-Kirche 30b (s. xv), 35r–36v Innsbruck, Stiftsbibliothek Wilten (s.n.) (s. xv), 153rb–154ra London, BL Royal 8 F.vi (s. xv), 24r *Mainz, Stadtbibliothek, I 227 (s. xv), 143r–143v Mattsee, Stiftsbibliothek, 49 (s. xv), 182ra–184rb Munich, Universitätsbibliothek, 2° 120 (s. xv), 33rb – 34rb Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek (s. xv), clm 3433, 209vb–210rb [Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, clm 12,005 (s. xv), 91r (s. xv), extract ] Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, clm 22,377 (s. xv), 82va–83ra Rostock, Universitätsbibliothek, theol. 37a (s. xv), 47va–48rb

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2960.253

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedieval Literature and History→French-language works237,207→