Analysis and characterization of manganese doped FeS thin films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fe1-xMnxS thin films with concentration have been deposited on glass substrates by a simple Chemical Bath Deposition (CBD) method at 90 oC. The X-ray Diffraction analysis of deposited thin films revealed the growth of mono-phasic mackinawite (FeS) with crystallite size in the range from 4.06 to 5.95 nm as a function of manganese concentrations. The other structural parameters like stacking faults, dislocation density and lattice strain affirmed the improvement in structure and phase stability in manganese doped FeS thin films. Scanning Electron Micrographs depicted the growth of nano-flakes and nano- flowers in case of pure FeS thin films while for manganese doped iron sulfide thin films, homogeneity of the deposited material was observed to improve with distinct boundaries of almost spherical nanostructures. The direct energy band gap of FeS mono-phasic thin films was observed to decrease from 2.23 to 1.89 eV as function of doping concentration. The prepared thin films with tunable optical properties would have potential applications in energy conversion and optoelectronic devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".