Multicultural Education In The Perspective of National And Islamic Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This writing is backgrounded by the urgency of multicultural education implementation in Indonesia as the plural nation having the slogan of Bhineka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity). The multicultural education discourse in Indonesia has been introduced since 1999 in the beginning of reformation era which has emerged the new paradigm in education from centralization to be decentralization. Various phenomena of tribes disputes, feeling and religion that happened, has strenghened the importance of multicultural education implementation at schools. This matter was aimed to educate the students with the sensitivity and care of their environement of multi-ethnic, culture, languange even the religion. So that they have capability of facing various social problems in their environment rooted from the difference. This matter can be implemented in the learning intergrally or showing up a new learning model which respect the people heterogenity. How is the concept of multicultural education in the perspective of national and Islamic education? The theme becomes the focus of this writing. It is necessary to find the correct and specific formulation on how the relevant multicultural education in the context of Indonesian society, as the society which has the high respect to the religious, morale, and eastern culture values. This condition is important so that the multicultural education resounded before in the western countries like America, Canada, and Australia do not “destroy” and “take” the Indonesian culture root. Key Words: Education, Multicultural, Plural, Globalization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".