MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Atlantic bluefin tuna diet variability in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada

2023· article· en· W4324030691 on OpenAlexaffabout
François Turcotte, Alex Hanke, Jenni L. McDermid

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Environmental Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTunaFisheryHerringThunnusPredationScombridaeMackerelBiologyAtlantic codAtlantic herringYellowfin tunaFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyClupeaGadus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The abundance of top predators in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, has fluctuated dramatically in recent decades. The associated increase in predation and its effect on the lack of recovery of many fish stocks in the system generates the need for a better understanding of predator-prey relationships and the implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management. This study used stomach content analysis to further describe the diet of Atlantic bluefin tuna in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Teleost fish largely dominated the stomach contents in all years. Previous studies established that Atlantic herring was the main component of the diet by weight, whereas herring was almost absent from the diet in this study. A shift in the diet of Atlantic bluefin tuna has been observed, as it now feeds almost exclusively on Atlantic mackerel. The estimated daily meal varied between years, ranging from 1026 g per day in 2019 to 2360 g per day in 2018. Daily meals and daily rations were calculated and showed substantial year-to-year variation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Environmental ResearchSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207