Modelling of CFRP-Strengthened RC Shear Walls with a Focus on End-Anchor Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study first provides an overview of the development of a novel tube anchor system for the seismic strengthening or repair of reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls with carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets. The new anchor system can significantly improve the load transfer mechanism between the CFRP and supporting RC structural elements, resulting in ductile behaviour of the strengthened shear walls with increases of lateral load capacity and ductility by up to 2.6 and 8.3 times, respectively. The study then presents a new finite element modelling technique capable of capturing the complete cyclic response, i.e., from the elastic behaviour to the ultimate collapse of CFRP-strengthened RC shear walls with the newly developed tube anchor system. Two different modelling approaches are proposed to consider the effects of the tube anchor system. Additionally, other important CFRP- and RC-related mechanisms, including CFRP debonding effects, confinement enhancement, tension stiffening, compression softening, and strength and stiffness degradation under cyclic loads, are also considered in the model. By comparing the analytical and experimental results, it is demonstrated that the proposed modelling approach can accurately replicate the complex behaviour of CFRP-strengthened shear walls with a wide range of aspect ratios, from the ductile flexural behaviour of slender walls to the brittle shear failure of squat walls, without requiring detailed modelling of the anchor system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".