MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324058432 · doi:10.3390/app13063640

A Reinforcement Learning-Based Congestion Control Approach for V2V Communication in VANET

2023· article· en· W4324058432 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaofeng Liu, Ben St. Amour, Arunita Jaekel

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningVehicular ad hoc networkMarkov decision processNetwork congestionComputer networkTransmission (telecommunications)Intelligent transportation systemChannel (broadcasting)Situation awarenessFlexibility (engineering)Traffic congestionNetwork packetWireless ad hoc networkDistributed computingMarkov processWirelessEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTransport engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) are crucial components of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) aimed at enhancing road safety and providing additional services to vehicles and their users. To achieve reliable delivery of periodic status information, referred to as basic safety messages (BSMs) and event-driven alerts, vehicles need to manage the conflicting requirements of situational awareness and congestion control in a dynamic environment. To address this challenge, this paper focuses on controlling the message transmission rate through a Markov decision process (MDP) and solves it using a novel reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm. The proposed RL approach selects the most suitable transmission rate based on the current channel conditions, resulting in a balanced performance in terms of packet delivery and channel congestion, as shown by simulation results for different traffic scenarios. Additionally, the proposed approach offers increased flexibility for adaptive congestion control through the design of an appropriate reward function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207