Excited-State Polarizabilities: A Combined Density Functional Theory and Information-Theoretic Approach Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and efficient determination of excited-state polarizabilities (α) is an open problem both experimentally and computationally. Following our previous work, (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 2131−2141), in which we employed simple ground-state (S0) density-related functions from the information-theoretic approach (ITA) to accurately and efficiently evaluate the macromolecular polarizabilities, in this work we aimed to predict the lowest excited-state (S1) polarizabilities. The philosophy is to use density-based functions to depict excited-state polarizabilities. As a proof-of-principle application, employing 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzimidazole (HBI), its substituents, and some other commonly used ESIPT (excited-state intramolecular proton transfer) fluorophores as model systems, we verified that either with S0 or S1 densities as an input, ITA quantities can be strongly correlated with the excited-state polarizabilities. When transition densities are considered, both S0 and S1 polarizabilities are in good relationships with some ITA quantities. The transferability of the linear regression model is further verified for a series of molecules with little or no similarity to those molecules in the training set. Furthermore, the excitation energies can be predicted based on multivariant linear regression equations of ITA quantities. This study also found that the nature of both the ground-state and excited-state polarizabilities of these species are due to the spatial delocalization of the electron density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".