فاعلیة استراتیجیة التعلم المستند إلى جانبی الدماغ فی تحصیل طالبات الصف الخامس علمی فی مادة الریاضیات
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of current research is to knowing The Effectiveness of learning strategy based on both sides of the brain in the achievement and Mathematic Flexibility for 5th year high school female students, the search sample consisted of 46 students were selected from two different schools , Aden preparatory female and Baghdad preparatory female during the first quarter academic year 2015-2016 for the application of the search experience. The sample was divided randomly by lottery into two groups the first is experimental group consist of 22student and the second control group is composed of 24 students ,the tow equivalent for material search based on several variables , including the academic achievement of the previous year ,the previous mathematical knowledge ,IQ test ,chronological age ,educational attainment of the parents, test the of brain control. The experimental group underwent to study experimental learning strategy based on both sides of the brain , while the control group traditional manner. Impose no difference is statistically significant at the level α= 0.05 between the average level students the experimental and control group in the mathematical achievement test. It was built achievement test consisting of 25 paragraph divided by 18objective paragraph ,while the remaining paragraphs of the kind pans .In addition to be sure from the psychometric characters for each test through checking reliability and steadiness. After using the statistical materials for analyzing For example Pearsons Correlation Coefficient and Alpha Cronback. Dish test on a sample search and subject to the results of statistical processing by t-test for two independent samples. Results showed superiority of students in the experimental group who has studied depending learning strategy based on both sides of the brain to control group students learning strategy and that the traditional method adopted in the study ,and thus it became clear that the strategy followed her Effectiveness after extracting the magnitude of the impact in the collection of mathematics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".