FDG PET-CT imaging in assessing interim response to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): A prospective study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
460 Background: Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive local disease where initial staging with conventional CT imaging is often suboptimal. To explore the role of PET-CT in both staging MIBC and assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), we conducted a prospective multicentre, randomized trial known as PETMUSE. We report here the first results from the neoadjuvant substudy which assessed interim PET-CT response after 2-3 cycles of NAC and how this correlated with disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients with MIBC (T2a-4a, N0-3, M0) based on transurethral resection of their bladder tumor and CT staging were randomized 2:1 to PET-CT or no PET-CT. All PET-CT patients, receiving cisplatin-based NAC underwent a second PET-CT after 2 cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) or 3 cycles of dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplatin (ddMVAC) to assess for interim response. Patients were scored (1-5) by 2 independent reviewers according to the extent of metabolic response on PET-CT. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected. Results: Between 2016 and 2021, 291 patients were enrolled on PETMUSE of which 46 participated in the neoadjuvant substudy. Median age was 68 (51-86); 36 (78%) were male; 26 were ECOG 0 (57%); 31 (68%) were T2, 13 (28%) were T3/T4; and 35 (76%) were node negative. In terms of NAC regimens: 22 (48%) received GC, 17 (37%) split dose GC, 6 (13%) ddMVAC, and 1 (2%) MVAC. On PET-CT, 23 (50%) had a complete metabolic response, 14 (30%) had a partial metabolic response, 5 (11%) had no change or mixed response and 4 (9%) had progressive disease or new lesion on PET scan. Metabolic response on PET-CT was a statistically significant prognostic factor for both DFS and OS (see Table). Conclusions: In MIBC patients receiving cisplatin-based NAC, metabolic response seen on interim PET-CT was correlated with DFS and OS. PET-CT warrants further study in this setting as a potential early indicator of response to NAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02462239 . [Table: see text][Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".