Association of rare variants in <i>ARSA</i> with Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Several lysosomal genes are associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD), yet the association between PD and ARSA , which encodes for the enzyme arylsulfatase A, remains controversial. Objectives To evaluate the association between rare ARSA variants and PD. Methods To study possible association of rare variants (minor allele frequency<0.01) in ARSA with PD, we performed burden analyses in six independent cohorts with a total of 5,801 PD patients and 20,475 controls, using optimized sequence Kernel association test (SKAT-O), followed by a meta-analysis. Results We found evidence for an association between functional ARSA variants and PD in four independent cohorts (P≤0.05 in each) and in the meta-analysis (P=0.042). We also found an association between loss-of-function variants and PD in the UKBB cohort (P=0.005) and in the meta-analysis (P=0.049). However, despite replicating in four independent cohorts, these results should be interpreted with caution as no association survived correction for multiple comparisons. Additionally, we describe two families with potential co-segregation of the ARSA variant p.E384K and PD. Conclusions Rare functional and loss-of-function ARSA variants may be associated with PD. Further replication in large case-control cohorts and in familial studies is required to confirm these associations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".