Significance of Intermittent Hypoxic Episodes in Premature Infants Prior to Discharge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to determine the rate and severity of intermittent hypoxic episodes in premature infants who underwent overnight pulse oximetry prior to discharge. Methods Preterm infants with a birth weight of 1500 grams or less and who underwent overnight pulse oximetry prior to discharge were included. Maternal and neonatal demographic data and complications of prematurity were recorded. All infants underwent overnight pulse oximetry prior to discharge and the McGill score was used to categorize the degree of desaturations (categories 1-4; normal, mildly, moderately, and severely abnormal). Results Fifty infants underwent the overnight pulse oximetry The McGill score showed that 2% had no hypoxia, 50% had mild hypoxia, 20% had moderate hypoxia, and 28% had severe hypoxia. The frequency of desaturations (62.5%) was found more in infants with a birth weight of 1000 grams or less. The results showed that the O2 requirement at discharge was significant (p = 0.0341), and increased values of O2 at discharge were associated with more severe hypoxia. As a result of these findings, 40% of infants were discharged home on oxygen and 26% were discharged on caffeine. Fifty-two percent of infants were initially diagnosed to have stages 1 & 2 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), 14% had stage 3, and 2% had stage 4 ROP. Eight percent of infants required surgical intervention for ROP. Conclusions Clinically inapparent significant episodes of intermittent hypoxia (IH) are frequent in preterm infants in the early postnatal age, and they may persist post-discharge. Knowledge of the association between IH and morbidity among all neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) caregivers would be of great benefit. Indications for screening preterm infants at risk of severe IH should be reconsidered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".