Brain morphological changes in patients with diagnosis of anorexia nervosa. Nutritional rehabilitation and neuroregeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives.Magnetic resonance imaging studies revealed changes in the brains of patients suffering from anorexia nervosa (AN), such as brain volume reduction, deepening of the brain's sulcus and fissures, widening of the lateral ventricles, and cerebrospinal fluid amount increase.This study aims to review research relating to changes in the brain structure under the influence of malnutrition in AN and the neuronal reconstruction of the brain during clinical recovery.Literature review.The article was prepared based on the results of neuroimaging studies in people with AN, published in Polish and English-language journals between 1990 and 2022.The research on the influence of nutritional therapy on the regression of previously occurring structural changes in the brain in AN published in Polish and English-language journals between 1990 and 2022 was also reviewed.Conclusions.In AN, structural changes of the CNS are formed, and the total volume of the brain (TBV) and its Review article / Artykuł poglądowy Brain morphological changes in patients with diagnosis of anorexia nervosa. Nutritional rehabilitation and neuroregenerationZmiany morfologiczne w mózgu u chorych z diagnozą jadłowstrętu psychicznego.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".