MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Case report

2008· article· en· W4324291276 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastueb Buczinski, Ann-Marie Belanger, Mauricio Badillo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Bovine Practitioner · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUterusSurgeryIce calvingAbdominal cavityPeritonitisPresentation (obstetrics)Estrous cyclePregnancyInternal medicineBiologyLactation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two heifers and one cow died shortly after calving: all three calved with the calf in posterior presentation. The first heifer was examined for recumbency and shock, and died despite therapy, while the second heifer died acutely without being examined premortem. The adult cow died from acute peritonitis three days after an uncomplicated standing left-flank cesarean-section. At necropsy, all animals had ruptured intestines and hyperacute peritonitis with digestive content free in the abdominal cavity. No signs of trauma were seen in the uterus and vagina of the two heifers. The uterine suture and uterine involution were considered normal in the cow that underwent the C-section. This is the first report of perforated intestines secondary to posterior presentation during calving without trauma of the reproductive tract. Although the precise physiopathology of this abnormality is still unknown, entrapment of the small intestine between the uterus and the pubis of the cow, and falling down during expulsion of the calf, might explain the cause.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0100.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Bovine PractitionerSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207