Neurosensory anatomy and function in <i>Seymouria</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seymouria is among the best-known stem amniotes and holds an important phylogenetic position for discussions of amniote evolution. Previous work has focused primarily on the osteology of Seymouria, with recent interest turning to the application of computed tomography (CT) to study the internal features. We utilized neutron CT to reconstruct the first virtual cranial endocast and the first complete otic endocasts of Seymouria, revealing previously unrecognized details of its palaeoneuroanatomy. The brain and inner ear of Seymouria are largely plesiomorphic relative to later-diverging crown amniotes, showing no indication of increased encephalization or braincase ossification. Our results also clarify the plesiomorphic condition for carotid artery morphology in amniotes, with Seymouria showing a similar condition to basal members of both the synapsid and sauropsid lineages. The reconstructed neuroanatomy also indicates that Seymouria did not possess any particular neuroanatomical specializations, despite the probable presence of an impedance matching hearing system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".