MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324346065 · doi:10.1007/s11273-023-09918-3

Groundwater characterization of the eastern Minesing Wetlands in support of the endangered Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana)

2023· article· en· W4324346065 on OpenAlexafffundabout
John Spoelstra, Ryan Post

Bibliographic record

VenueWetlands Ecology and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsToronto and Region Conservation AuthorityEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and ForestryMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsGroundwaterWetlandEndangered speciesEnvironmental scienceNitratePopulationThreatened speciesHydrology (agriculture)EcologyHabitatGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Minesing Wetlands contain Canada’s only known population of Hine’s emerald dragonfly (HED), a species listed as endangered since 2011. The HED relies on groundwater discharge areas to complete its life cycle and therefore the population is potentially sensitive to changes in groundwater. The goals of this study were to, (1) characterize groundwater discharge to the eastern portion of the Minesing Wetlands, which corresponds to the HED habitat, (2) document any significant changes in groundwater chemistry since a 1998 study, and (3) establish a comprehensive baseline water quality data set to facilitate future comparisons. Consistent with HED habitats in the USA, the chemistry of Minesing Wetlands groundwater was dominated by calcium and bicarbonate. Low groundwater chloride and nitrate concentrations indicated minimal impact from activities such as road salt application and fertilizer use. Nitrate was generally only found at the wetland margin where groundwater springs emerged from the base of the uplands. The dominant form of inorganic nitrogen in wetland groundwater was ammonium (max = 1.5 mg N/L), and soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations were also relatively high (8 to 122 µg/L). The most consistent change in wetland groundwater chemistry between the 1998 study and samples collected in 2015–2017 was that chloride concentrations in 10 of 23 wells increased over time, however the maximum mean well chloride (11.6 mg/L) remained well below the guideline for the protection of aquatic life (120 mg/L). To preserve HED habitat, potential impacts to groundwater need to be considered during land use planning for the recharge area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWetlands Ecology and ManagementSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207