Ultrastructure of an opecoelid daughter sporocyst, <i>Podocotyle</i> sp. (Digenea: Opecoelidae): comparative analysis of the somatic tissues and new insights into the organization of the nervous system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digenea is a group of widespread parasitic flatworms with a complex life cycle including a successive change of parthenogenetic and hermaphroditic generations. Daughter sporocysts are among the least studied parthenitae in terms of the ultrastructure of their body wall and nervous system. Here we present an ultrastructural and immunocytochemical study of Podocotyle sp. daughter sporocyst (Opecoelidae), parasitizing in Littorina obtusata Linnaeus, 1758 from the White Sea. Our results focus on the structure of the body wall, birth pore, excretory and nervous systems, and include new data on the taxonomic affiliation based on the partial cox1 mitochondrial DNA sequence. The daughter sporocyst of Podocotyle sp. has ultrastructural similarities with different plagiorchiid and diplostomid digeneans and also possesses some specific features. In the studied species, the birth canal is epithelialized, the body wall is composed of nine types of somatic cells and includes a well-developed central nervous system. Neurons of the latter form specific hemidesmosome-like attachment sites, which we found in digeneans for the first time. The obtained results are necessary to complement the comparative morphological analysis of daughter parthenogenetic generations in different digenean lineages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".