MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327580279 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.034911

Inclusive jet and hadron suppression in a multistage approach

2023· article· en· W4327580279 on OpenAlexafffund
Amit Kumar, Y. Tachibana, C. Sirimanna, G. Vujanovic, Shanshan Cao, Abhijit Majumder, Y. Chen, Lipei Du, R. J. Ehlers, D. Everett, Wenkai Fan, Yayun He, James Declan Mulligan, C. Park, A. Angerami, R. Arora, Steffen A. Bass, T. Dai, Hannah Elfner, Rainer J. Fries, Charles Gale, F. Garza, M. Heffernan, Ulrich Heinz, B. V. Jacak, P.M. Jacobs, Sangyong Jeon, K. Kauder, L. Kasper, Weiyao Ke, M. Kelsey, B. Kim, M. Kordell, Joseph Latessa, Y.-J. Lee, D. Liyanage, A. Lopez, Matthew Luzum, Simon Mak, Andi Mankolli, C. De Martín, H. Mehryar, T. Mengel, C. Nattrass, Dmytro Oliinychenko, Jean-François Paquet, J. Putschke, G. Roland, Björn Schenke, Loren Schwiebert, A. Sengupta, Chun Shen, A. Silva, D. Soeder, R. A. Soltz, Jan Staudenmaier, Michael Strickland, J. Velkovska, X.-N. Wang, Robert L. Wolpert

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaMcGill University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceCentral China Normal UniversityOffice of the Vice President for Research, Wayne State UniversityUniversity of Texas at AustinAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science FoundationWayne State UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of California
KeywordsPhysicsPartonLarge Hadron ColliderParticle physicsNuclear physicsHadronScatteringQuark–gluon plasmaJet (fluid)GluonQuark

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new study of jet interactions in the quark-gluon plasma created in high-energy heavy-ion collisions, using a multistage event generator within the jetscape framework. We focus on medium-induced modifications in the rate of inclusive jets and high transverse momentum (high-${p}_{\mathrm{T}}$) hadrons. Scattering-induced jet energy loss is calculated in two stages: a high virtuality stage based on the matter model, in which scattering of highly virtual partons modifies the vacuum radiation pattern, and a second stage at lower jet virtuality based on the lbt model, in which leading partons gain and lose virtuality by scattering and radiation. Coherence effects that reduce the medium-induced emission rate in the matter phase are also included. The trento model is used for initial conditions, and the ($2+1$)dimensional vishnu model is used for viscous hydrodynamic evolution. Jet interactions with the medium are modeled via 2-to-2 scattering with Debye screened potentials, in which the recoiling partons are tracked, hadronized, and included in the jet clustering. Holes left in the medium are also tracked and subtracted to conserve transverse momentum. Calculations of the nuclear modification factor (${R}_{\mathrm{AA}}$) for inclusive jets and high-${p}_{\mathrm{T}}$ hadrons are compared to experimental measurements at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Within this framework, we find that with one extra parameter which codifies the transition between stages of jet modification---along with the typical parameters such as the coupling in the medium, the start and stop criteria, etc.---we can describe these data at all energies for central and semicentral collisions without a rescaling of the jet transport coefficient $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{q}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207