MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327636540 · doi:10.1017/9781580466202.002

Preface

2004· other· en· W4327636540 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel Hsu, Mark Peters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViolinPianoPassionQuarter (Canadian coin)ArtArt historyLiteratureHumanitiesHistoryPsychologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the first quarter of the twentieth century, Arthur Hartmann (1881– 1956) was celebrated as one of the world's finest violinists. He performed over a thousand recitals throughout Europe and the United States and consistently received critical acclaim for the sensitivity and passion of his playing. He also composed a respectable body of instrumental and vocal works and was particularly well known for the over two hundred transcriptions he created for violin and piano. Several of these became staples on the programs of such colleagues as Mischa Elman, Jascha Heifetz, Fritz Kreisler, Yehudi Menuhin, Maud Powell, and Jacques Thibaud. Hartmann also wrote pedagogical articles on violin technique and was considered an authority on Bach's violin works, particularly the Chaconne. He was highly regarded as a teacher and was recruited in 1918 for the faculty of the DKG Institute of Musical Art, which became the Eastman School of Music in 1921. In Rochester, Hartmann led the Kilbourn Quartet, which performed weekly in George Eastman's mansion for his friends and guests. Leaving Eastman in 1922, he soon formed the Hartmann Quartet, which specialized in bringing to American audiences works by Frank Bridge, Alfred Casella, Ernst von Dohnányi, Eugene Goossens, and other contemporaries, as well as the standard repertoire. His fellow musicians, from Leopold Auer to Efrem Zimbalist, valued his friendship and enjoyed his legendary abilities as a raconteur and musical mimic. Throughout his life, Hartmann was fascinated with meeting famous people, and his wit, talent, and ingratiating personality endeared him to such major figures as Eugène Ysaÿe, Edvard Grieg, and, above all, Claude Debussy. In a letter to Louis Laloy dated 5 January 1914, Debussy wrote: “[Hartmann] est intéressant et joue prodigieusement du violon” (“[Hartmann] is an engaging person and an extraordinary violinist”). Up to now, little has been known about the relationship between Debussy and Hartmann, except for the fact that the composer accompanied the violinist in a program on 5 February 1914 that featured Hartmann's transcriptions of Debussy's Il pleure dans mon coeur, La fille aux cheveux de lin, and Minstrels. Now with the publication of Hartmann's memoir “Claude Debussy As I Knew Him,” along with the letters from the composer and his wife, Emma, to the violinist and his wife, Marie, the richness of their relationship can be appreciated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5500.388

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207