MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4327637140 · doi:10.1017/9781580466646.003

Hooked on Hookworm

2006· other· en· W4327637140 on OpenAlexaff
Anne‐Emanuelle Birn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompromisePublic healthGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceInstitutionalisationPublic administrationMedicineLawNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because the RF's first public health campaign in Mexico had been funded and organized on a scale both to satisfy the RF's larger yellow fever eradication ambitions and to woo its hard-to-get Mexican counterpart, it was the campaign that followed yellow fever that would better define the terms of the relationship. At the most pragmatic level, the IHB's stock campaign against hookworm disease offered a compromise collaboration. It would both keep the RF in Mexico at a lower expense and extend the reach of the DSP, albeit for an ailment that was not a high epidemiologic priority. The claims on Mexico's federal government stemming from the revolution demanded far more public health infrastructure than the hookworm campaign could provide, yet the campaign's very existence in a key region served as a powerful demonstration of the institutionalization of health services to come. In locating the campaign in and around Veracruz, where unrest continued to threaten Mexico City, the Mexican government and the RF shared the view that popular public health efforts could help stabilize the region. As during the yellow fever campaign, the IHB sought to play both sides against the middle, courting Mexico City officials and Veracruz leaders at the same time. The DSP made use of the IHB campaign to heighten its presence in Veracruz during a politically thorny period, distancing itself from the RF as necessary. This was a dangerous game for all parties, and the RF-Mexico collaboration at times seemed to be tempting fate. The hookworm agreement sought to establish a balance of power between the DSP and the IHB, in which the IHB maintained the upper hand in the selection of the disease and in decisions over the financial obligations of all parties. In addition, RF officers were given considerable latitude in day-to-day operations, even when the campaign faced controversy over treatment regimes and preventive measures. But the DSP was no tabula rasa waiting to be inscribed upon from afar. At the time when arrangements for a new cooperative endeavor were being crafted in 1922–23, the DSP was expanding its role in areas such as health education, child hygiene, and professional training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→