MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327637148 · doi:10.1017/9781580466646.001

Introduction: The Fever of International Health

2006· other· en· W4327637148 on OpenAlexaff
Anne‐Emanuelle Birn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Medicine and Tropical Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGratitudeFoundation (evidence)HygieneUnit (ring theory)Public healthPolitical scienceGerontologyHistoryLibrary scienceMedicinePsychologyLawNursingMathematics educationSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In January 1929, just a few months after he returned to Mexico from his doctoral studies at the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland, Rockefeller Foundation (RF) fellow Miguel Bustamante penned a heartfelt letter to his former dean, William Howell. Peppering his progress report with words of gratitude, Bustamante wrote of his new appointment as chief of the Port of Veracruz sanitary unit, Mexico's first attempt at “cooperative and systematic work for the improvement of the Public Health conditions in our Cities.” He relayed the “real effort” his country was expending and hoped that he would be “doing something good with the cooperation of our people.” Bustamante concluded, “Of course I recognize how much I own [ sic ] to our School and the Foundation and hope not to disappoint any of you.” This missive, written by one of Mexico's most esteemed public health doctors, embodied the characteristics of the relationship between revolutionary Mexico and the RF: multifaceted interaction. Bustamante conveyed a mixture of national pride and know-how, the challenge of collaborating with the public, a reliance on modern public health methods, and his indebtedness to international patronage. The principals in this three-decade public health partnership were the RF’s International Health Division (IHD; International Health Board until 1927) and the Mexican government's Department of Public Health (Departamento de Salubridad Pública; DSP). In addition, numerous other parties—ranging from traditional healers to national leaders, elite physicians to rural health officers, foreign philanthropists to small townsfolk—would also be involved. Different ideas would appear, some homegrown, some imported, some local, some international, some traversing back and forth. In the course of this complex involvement, there would be times of productive cooperation, appropriation, disdain, rejection, outright hostility, and bona fide accomplishment, making the survival of the relationship an achievement in and of itself. This interaction took place between 1921 and 1951 through a series of projects centered in a handful of Mexican states and administered from Mexico City, New York, and several regional capitals. The RF-Mexico liaison began with a large-scale yellow fever campaign based along the Gulf Coast and extending into the Yucatán peninsula. In 1924, the yellow fever effort was converted into a lower-cost but intensive hookworm campaign that reached hundreds of thousands of people in small towns, mostly in the state of Veracruz, and, later, in Oaxaca and Chiapas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistory of Medicine and Tropical HealthFrench-language works237,207