MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327650502 · doi:10.15593/perm.kipf/2022.4.11

Club Institutions in the Urban Space of Leningrad (1950-1960s)

2022· article· en· W4327650502 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yarmolich Fedor

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnologos · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubSocializationUrban planningQuarter (Canadian coin)Space (punctuation)Process (computing)SociologyPolitical sciencePublic relationsCivil engineeringSocial scienceEngineeringHistoryArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the importance of club organizations in the design of the urban environment, and also studies their influence on the process of human socialization. Attention is drawn to the fact that the transition of urban planning from the quarter to the microdistrict principle in the late 1950s significantly increased the role of houses and palaces of culture in urban planning, giving them the status of city-forming elements around which the architectural and planning composition of a microdistrict or district was built. The transition to the microdistrict principle and the changes that took place in the Soviet society in the second half of the 1950s - 1960s also influenced the potential of club institutions in incorporating a person into the Soviet society, which, of course, led to both an increase in the importance of club organizations in the life of a person and set new tasks for such organizations, such as finding the optimal mechanism for incorporating the constantly changing Soviet person into the public space. The aim of the article is to demonstrate how the importance of cultural institutions in the urban environment has changed over time. To achieve it, the following objectives have been solved: it is demonstrated how the role of houses and palaces of culture was influenced by the transition to the microdistrict principle of urban planning; when analyzing the role of clubs in the process of socialization, attention is drawn to the various tools that were at their disposal. To achieve this goal and objectives, problem-chronological, historical-comparative, historical-genetic methods are used. The novelty of this article is in the fact that the research is based on the materials of Leningrad clubs operating in the 1950s - 1960s. It is proposed to study the role of club organizations within the city in terms of their influence on architectural and planning decisions and participation in the process of incorporating a person into the urban society. To solve these problems, archival materials that have not been previously published are introduced into scientific circulation, so they may be of interest to a large number of readers, as they will expand its understanding of Soviet everyday life in the 1950s and 1960s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnologosSame topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207