Protein Deficient Diets: Cascade Effects on a Lepidopteran Pest and Its Parasitoid Wasp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The nutritional quality of herbivorous insects’ food can not only directly affect the herbivorous insects themselves, but can also indirectly affect their parasitoids. To investigate these cascading, multi-trophic effects, we reared cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on artificial diets (8.1, 11.5, 16.75, 25.5, 34.25, and 43 g protein/liter diet) to assess how diet protein content affected the development of this common pest and its suitability as a host for the gregarious parasitoid, Cotesia vanessae (Reinhard) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Nonparasitized caterpillars experienced increased mortality when reared on 8.1 g protein/liter diet, and slower development and reduced pupal mass when reared on ≤16.75 g protein/liter diet. Host diet did not affect the percentage of hosts with parasitoid emergence nor the mass of individual parasitoids. However, parasitoid broods emerging from caterpillars reared on ≤25.5 g protein/liter diet were smaller and those reared on ≤16.75 g protein/liter diet exhibited prolonged development. The consequences of host diet on these latter F1 parasitoids did not affect their reproductive fitness. Caterpillars compensated for nutrient stress, induced by either low quality diet or parasitism, by increasing the amount of diet that they consumed. These collective results demonstrate the plasticity of host-parasitoid systems. Compensatory feeding allows the host caterpillar to moderate the consequences of low quality diets, which may subsequently affect the F1 parasitoids developing within the host, but not necessarily affect the F2 parasitoid generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".