MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327705424 · doi:10.1016/j.jaclp.2022.09.002

Catatonia Following Autologous Tumor-Infiltrating Immunotherapy and Interleukin-2 Infusions: A Case Report

2023· letter· en· W4327705424 on OpenAlex
Joellyn Sheehy, Christina L. Lee, Holly Shiao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioDepression (economics)Meta-analysisInternal medicineCohort studyConfidence intervalCohortHematopoietic stem cell transplantationAnxietyTransplantationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depressive symptoms are often found in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the impact of depression on overall survival and other outcomes after HSCT has not been systematically reviewed.The objective of this review was to determine if depression before HSCT is associated with poor posttransplant outcomes.We performed a systematic research, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISM) guidelines based on several databases (MEDLINE, EMBase, and PsycINFO) for cohort studies on adults undergoing HSCT, comparing overall survival or other outcomes (length of aplasia, infectious complications) between patients with depressive symptoms and controls. For studies reporting overall survival hazard ratios, we conducted a meta-analysis by calculating a 95% confidence interval hazard ratios, and we assessed heterogeneity with the I2 statistic. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale for cohort studies.A total of 18 studies were included in the systematic review (22,235 participants) and 8 in the meta-analysis. There were a variety of depression screening tools, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) being the most reported questionnaire. A significant association between depression and overall survival was found in 9 studies, whereas 8 studies shown no association. Depression tended to have an impact on length of aplasia and infectious complications. In the meta-analysis, depression was found to impact significantly overall survival after HSCT with a hazard ratio = 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.03–1.11). A publication bias was found in the meta-analysis.Depression seems to have a significant impact on post-HSCT survival and on length of aplasia. A systematic screening of depression before HSCT should be considered, with validated tools such as HADS. Future research needs to be done to measure the impact of depression on HSCT response and understand its physiopathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it