MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327750038 · doi:10.15251/djnb.2023.181.315

Preparation and anti-biological adhesion performance evaluation of ZNO@PSBMA super hydrophilic coating

2023· article· en· W4327750038 on OpenAlexaff
G. Q. Xu, Chenshi Li, Chunyu Wang, Z. Y. Xue, Fuhao Liang, Xiaoping Shen, J. J. Wang, A. Amirfazli

Bibliographic record

VenueDigest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoatingMaterials scienceAqueous solutionSuperhydrophilicitySubstrate (aquarium)ZincChemical engineeringDispersion (optics)AdhesionComposite materialMetallurgyChemistryOrganic chemistryContact angle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles were modified by means of dispersion using a γ-aminopropyl triethoxysilane coupling agent (KH550), obtaining KH550-ZnO. Then a certain amount of SBMA powder was put into the KH550-ZnO solution, and the ensuing polymerization reaction produced super hydrophilic PSBMA-KH550-ZnO powder. Finally, several polished aluminum sheets were immersed in the PSBMA-KH550-ZnO aqueous solution to start deposition. Upon completion of the deposition, the aluminum sheets were taken out and dried to obtain samples of the ZnO@PSBMA super hydrophilic coating. The structure, morphology and chemical composition of the powders and coatings were investigated by SEM, IR and EDS. The dispersion of KH550-ZnO in aqueous solution was analyzed. The results show that the particle size of KH550-ZnO decreases greatly in aqueous solution. The substrate can be superhydrophilic when deposited in PSBMA-KH550-ZnO aqueous solution for 130 minutes,After 48 hours of coating deposition, the compactness, roughness and friction resistance of the coating are greatly improved. ZnO@PSBMA superhydrophilic coating has good anti-protein, anti-bacterial and anti-algal adhesion properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigest Journal of Nanomaterials and BiostructuresSame topicPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207