MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327808915 · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000000274

Letter to the Editor: Influence of maternal NAFLD on infant weight—the real precursor to NAFLD in offspring?

2023· letter· en· W4327808915 on OpenAlexaffabout
Monika Sarkar, Jennifer A. Flemming

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyOffspringObstetricsObesityChildhood obesityBirth weightIn uteroCirrhosisGestational agePediatricsFetusInternal medicineOverweight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the editor, We read with enthusiasm the publication by Amadou et al.1 demonstrating that within a large French cohort, extremes of birthweight increased the risk for NAFLD in adulthood. On mediation analysis, findings for low birthweight were explained by prematurity. As the authors’ highlight, an important limitation was unavailable maternal data, including maternal weight. Beyond maternal obesity, there remains a knowledge gap regarding the in-utero influence of maternal NAFLD on infant outcomes. NAFLD rates in pregnancy have nearly tripled over the past decade, and NAFLD cirrhosis is also rising in pregnant women.2,3 In pediatric populations, NAFLD can develop even in utero, and by school-age 10% of all children, and 30%–40% of those with obesity have NAFLD.4 Thus, there is an urgent need to identify early and modifiable risk factors in pregnant women with NAFLD and their offspring. Though prior data link maternal obesity to childhood NAFLD, the influence of maternal NAFLD on long-term metabolic outcomes has not been elucidated. In a large US study we evaluated NAFLD in pregnancy and maternal and perinatal outcomes at delivery.2 Importantly, maternal NAFLD increased risk for both large-for-gestational age infants (adjusted OR of 1.8, 95% CI: 1.4–2.5) and preterm birth (adjusted OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.3–2.0), independent of maternal metabolic comorbidities. Likewise, in our Canadian study of cirrhosis in pregnancy, maternal NAFLD independently increased arge-for-gestational age risk as compared with other etiologies of cirrhosis (RR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3–2.1).3 These data suggest a direct influence of in utero NAFLD exposure as a contributor to prematurity and arge-for-gestational age infants, key risk factors for long-term NAFLD risk in offspring as demonstrated by Amoudou and colleagues. Although the underlying mechanisms have not been elucidated, independent of diabetes and obesity the liver plays a critical role in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. NAFLD-specific effects beyond the liver include peripheral insulin resistance, systemic inflammation, and dysregulated lipid metabolism, which may help to explain our findings of increased arge-for-gestational age risk in infants of mothers with NAFLD. In summary, we applaud the work by Amadou and colleagues and emerging literature evaluating early influencers of NAFLD. An even earlier focus on preconception through postpartum periods may further define contributors to NAFLD in offspring, and support interventions among expectant mothers to help mitigate rising NAFLD rates in young populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatologySame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207