MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Poulain de la Barre, Francois

2023· reference-entry· en· W4327976002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martina Reuter, Tuomas Parsio

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2023
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtestantismCartesianismBachelorPopulationSociologyCriticismReligious studiesChristianityPhilosophyTheologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

François Poulain (or Poullain) de la Barre (b. 1648–d. 1723) was born in Paris to wealthy Catholic parents. He earned his bachelor’s degree in theology at Sorbonne in 1666, but left university to explore a secular career as a writer. He returned to theology and was ordained a Catholic priest in 1679, after which he served as a curate in Picardy, an area with a large Protestant population. Poulain underwent two major conversions during his lifetime: from the Scholasticism of Sorbonne to Cartesian philosophy in the 1660s and from Catholicism to Protestantism in the 1680s. The latter conversion made him resettle in Geneva, where he had a family and a teaching career. Poulain is best known for his three treatises on women and equality, On the Equality of the Two Sexes (1673), On the Education of Ladies (1674), and On the Excellence of Men (1675), but it is fair to say that all his writings were guided by some practical aim. He wanted to bring about equality between the sexes, but also to advocate a new Cartesian approach to philosophy, to give advice on language use, and to defend rational theology in the tense times of religious persecution and upheaval created by rivalling denominations of Christianity. Poulain’s thought was deeply influenced by Descartes’ methods of doubt and scientific reasoning, by his criticism of prejudice and Scholastic science, and by his distinction between mind and body and his mechanistic concept of body. Still, like many Cartesians, Poulain was an undogmatic follower of Descartes, and he considerably extended the realm of Cartesian philosophy by applying Descartes’ methodological insights to social and political issues such as the subjugation of women. Poulain also revised Descartes’ philosophical method by advocating a turn from solitary meditation toward joint conversations. Scholarship on Poulain has focused on him as a Cartesian philosopher and early defender of the equality of the sexes. Many studies combine these topics and examine his writings as articulations of early modern Cartesian feminism. There is also a small but vital number of scholars publishing mostly in French on Poulain’s writings about language and theology. Though writing before the times of explicit demands for women’s political rights and well before the coinage of the term feminism, Poulain deserves the title of feminist in the sense that he developed a detailed analysis of many different aspects of the subjugation of women by male power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and Reformation→Same topicHistorical and Literary Studies→French-language works237,207→