MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328008213 · doi:10.1109/tasc.2023.3258905

Electromagnetic Simulation of No-Insulation Coils Using H – $\phi$ Thin Shell Approximation

2023· article· en· W4328008213 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTechnische Universität DarmstadtUniversité de LiègePolytechnique MontréalCERN
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Mathematical notationPhysicsNotationTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsCombinatoricsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When simulating no-insulation high-temperature superconducting pancake coils with the finite element (FE) method, the high aspect ratio of the thin turn-to-turn contact layer (T2TCL) leads to unfavorable meshes in these thin layers as manifested by a high number of degrees of freedom (DoF) or mesh elements of poor quality which decrease the accuracy of the simulation results. To mitigate this issue, we propose to collapse the T2TCL volume into a surface using a thin shell approximation (TSA) for three-dimensional FE analysis. A <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\vec{H}-\phi$</tex-math></inline-formula> formulation is used and solves for the magnetic field strength <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\vec{H}$</tex-math></inline-formula> in conducting domains and the magnetic scalar potential <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\phi$</tex-math></inline-formula> in insulating domains. This formulation avoids spurious currents and reduces the number of DoF in insulating domains. Automatically created thick cuts are used to deal with multiply connected domains. Particular attention is paid to the interpretation of these cuts and the corresponding basis functions in the context of pancake coil geometries. The efficiency of the formulation facilitates the resolution of each turn. In this way, local phenomena such as quench can be captured in a straightforward way. The TSA formulation is verified by comparison against a reference model with volumetrically meshed T2TCL and is shown to be accurate and efficient, significantly reducing the solution time while reducing the effort for creating high-quality meshes. The TSA is implemented in an open-source FE framework and the source code is shared alongside this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it