Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis of TCP Family Genes in Tree Peony
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The TCP (Teosinte branched1/Cincinnata/proliferating cell factor) family gene is a kind of plant specific transcription factor, which plays a significant role in regulating plant growth and development. In this study, 18 TCP genes were identified from the tree peony transcriptome data, the molecular weight was between 18 978.32 and 51 789.56 Da, the isoelectric points was between 5.81 and 9.45, and the subcellular localization prediction of TCP family members was in the nucleus. The classification of conserved amino acids in the tree peony TCP domain was similar to that of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the TCP proteins of tree peony were divided into two categories, Class Ⅰ contained 10 TCP members, and Class Ⅱ contained 8 TCP members. MEME analysis results showed that 15 conserved domains were found in the tree peony TCP protein, Motif 1 was the TCP domain, and was found in all TCP members. Meanwhile, the transcription level of the tree peony TCP genes in bud, leaf, petal, piebaldness, stamen, pistil and seed were analyzed. This article systematically analyzed the tree peony TCP family genes, which provided a scientific basis for further research on functional genes and molecular breeding in tree peony.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it