MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328049270 · doi:10.1093/lambio/ovad037

Role of thiols and ascladiol production in patulin degradation by lactobacilli

2023· article· en· W4328049270 on OpenAlexafffund
Gautam Gaur, Michael G. Gänzle

Bibliographic record

VenueLetters in Applied Microbiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPatulinBiotransformationFermentationChemistryFood scienceMycotoxinYeastBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patulin is a mycotoxin contaminant in various foods with apple products being its major dietary source. Yeast can reduce patulin levels during fermentation via biotransformation and thiol-adduct formation, with the ability of patulin to react with thiols being well known. Conversion of patulin to ascladiol by lactobacilli has been sparsely reported, while the contribution of thiols in reduction of patulin levels by lactobacilli remains undocumented. In this study, 11 strains of lactobacilli were screened for ascladiol formation in apple juice fermentation. Highest bioconversion was obtained for Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains followed by Levilactobacillus brevis TMW1.465. Ascladiol production was also detected in several other lactobacilli species albeit in trace amounts. Reduction in patulin levels by Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis DMS 20451 and its glutathione reductase (ΔgshR) negative mutant was also assayed to determine the contribution of thiols. The hydrocinnamic acid reductase of Furfurilactobacillus milii did not contribute to reduction of patulin levels. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the potential of various lactobacilli in reduction of patulin levels via biotransformation of patulin to ascladiol, while also providing evidence for the role of thiol formation by lactobacilli and its presence in reducing patulin levels during fermentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLetters in Applied MicrobiologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207