MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Axonal ER Ca<sup>2+</sup>Release Selectively Enhances Activity-Independent Glutamate Release in a Huntington Disease Model

2023· article· en· W4328051667 on OpenAlexafffund
James P. Mackay, Amy Smith-Dijak, Ellen T. Koch, Peng Zhang, Evan Fung, Wissam B. Nassrallah, Caodu Buren, Mandi E. Schmidt, Michael R. Hayden, Lynn A. Raymond

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Open Neuroscience PlatformMichael Smith Health Research BCUniversity of British ColumbiaGovernment of CanadaHereditary Disease Foundation
KeywordsHuntington's diseaseGlutamate receptorChemistryNeuroscienceDiseaseBiologyBiochemistryInternal medicineMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Action potential-independent (miniature) neurotransmission occurs at all chemical synapses, but remains poorly understood, particularly in pathological contexts. Axonal endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+stores are thought to influence miniature neurotransmission, and aberrant ER Ca2+handling is implicated in progression of Huntington disease (HD). Here, we report elevated miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) frequencies in recordings from YAC128 mouse (HD-model) neurons (from cortical cultures and striatum-containing brain slices – both from male and female animals). Pharmacological experiments suggest this is mediated indirectly by enhanced tonic ER Ca2+release. Calcium imaging, using an axon-localized sensor, revealed slow action potential (AP)-independent ER Ca2+release waves in both YAC128 and wild-type cultures. These Ca2+waves occurred at similar frequencies in both genotypes, but spread less extensively and were of lower amplitude in YAC128 axons, consistent with axonal ER Ca2+store depletion. Surprisingly, basal cytosolic Ca2+levels were lower in YAC128 boutons and YAC128 mEPSCs were less sensitive to intracellular Ca2+chelation. Together, these data suggest elevated miniature glutamate release in YAC128 cultures is associated with axonal ER Ca2+depletion but not directly mediated by ER Ca2+release into the cytoplasm. In contrast to increased mEPSC frequencies, cultured YAC128 cortical neurons showed less frequent AP-dependent (spontaneous) Ca2+events in soma and axons, although evoked glutamate release detected by iGluSnFR in brain slices was similar between genotypes. Our results indicate axonal ER dysfunction selectively elevates miniature glutamate release from cortical terminals in HD. This, together with reduced spontaneous cortical neuron firing, may cause a shift from activity-dependent to -independent glutamate release in HD, with potential implications for fidelity and plasticity of cortical excitatory signaling. Significance statement Miniature neurotransmitter release persists at all chemical neuronal synapses in the absence of action potential firing but remains poorly understood, particularly in disease states. We show enhanced miniature glutamate release from cortical neurons in the YAC128 mouse Huntington disease model. This effect is mediated by axonal ER Ca2+store depletion, but is not obviously due to elevated ER-to-cytosol Ca2+release. Conversely, YAC128 cortical pyramidal neurons fired fewer action potentials and evoked cortical glutamate release was similar between WT an YAC128 preparations, indicating axonal ER depletion selectively enhances miniature glutamate release in YAC128 mice. These results extend our understanding of action potential independent neurotransmission and highlight a potential involvement of elevated miniature glutamate release in Huntington disease pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→