MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328052068 · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37232-2

Integrating terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to constrain estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange

2023· review· en· W4328052068 on OpenAlexafffund
Joan Pere Casas‐Ruiz, Pascal Bodmer, Kelly Ann Bona, David Butman, Mathilde Couturier, Erik J. S. Emilson, Kerri Finlay, Hélène Genet, Daniel J. Hayes, Jan Karlsson, David Paré, Changhui Peng, Robert G. Striegl, Jackie R. Webb, Xinyuan Wei, Susan E. Ziegler, Paul A. del Giorgio

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversité du Québec à MontréalOntario Forest Research InstituteNatural Resources CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeakin UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTerrestrial ecosystemAtmosphere (unit)Environmental scienceWatershedEcosystemAquatic ecosystemLand useEnvironmental resource managementCarbon cycleTerrestrial plantEarth scienceCarbon fibersEcologyComputer scienceGeographyGeologyMeteorologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this Perspective, we put forward an integrative framework to improve estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange based on the accumulation of carbon in the landscape as constrained by its lateral export through rivers. The framework uses the watershed as the fundamental spatial unit and integrates all terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems as well as their hydrologic carbon exchanges. Application of the framework should help bridge the existing gap between land and atmosphere-based approaches and offers a platform to increase communication and synergy among the terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric research communities that is paramount to advance landscape carbon budget assessments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207