Genome-Wide Identification of Expansin Gene Family and Their Response under Hormone Exposure in Ginkgo biloba L.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expansins are pH-dependent enzymatic proteins that irreversibly and continuously facilitate cell-wall loosening and extension. The identification and comprehensive analysis of Ginkgo biloba expansins (GbEXPs) are still lacking. Here, we identified and investigated 46 GbEXPs in Ginkgo biloba. All GbEXPs were grouped into four subgroups based on phylogeny. GbEXPA31 was cloned and subjected to a subcellular localization assay to verify our identification. The conserved motifs, gene organization, cis-elements, and Gene Ontology (GO) annotation were predicted to better understand the functional characteristics of GbEXPs. The collinearity test indicated segmental duplication dominated the expansion of the GbEXPA subgroup, and seven paralogous pairs underwent strong positive selection during expansion. A majority of GbEXPAs were mainly expressed in developing Ginkgo kernels or fruits in transcriptome and real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). Furthermore, GbEXLA4, GbEXLA5, GbEXPA5, GbEXPA6, GbEXPA8, and GbEXPA24 were inhibited under the exposure of abiotic stresses (UV-B and drought) and plant hormones (ABA, SA, and BR). In general, this study expanded our understanding for expansins in Ginkgo tissues’ growth and development and provided a new basis for studying GbEXPs in response to exogenous phytohormones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".