MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328127110 · doi:10.1002/lpor.202200860

All‐Dielectric Huygens’ Meta‐Waveguides for Resonant Integrated Photonics

2023· article· en· W4328127110 on OpenAlexaff
Yunus Denizhan Sırmacı, Angela Barreda Gomez, Thomas Pertsch, Jens H. Schmid, Pavel Cheben, Isabelle Staude

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser & Photonics Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsNanophotonicsPhotonicsOptoelectronicsMetamaterialWaveguideSilicon photonicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The growing maturity of nanofabrication technology has recently enabled the deployment of high‐quality subwavelength nanostructures on photonic chips. Combining existing photonic waveguide technology with the paradigms adapted from metamaterials opens new avenues towards unprecedented control of guided light waves. However, developing new functionalities while preserving efficiencies and offering compatibility with current technology remains a major challenge in on‐chip nanophotonics. Here, a novel silicon nanophotonic waveguide comprising a chain of resonantly forward scattering nanoparticles empowered by spectrally overlapping electric and magnetic dipolar Mie‐type resonances is proposed and demonstrated. The propagation loss of the meta‐waveguides in the telecom spectral range is as low as 0.4 dB mm −1 , exceeding the current record for Mie‐resonant waveguides by more than an order of magnitude. Furthermore, the meta‐waveguides support a negative group index over a broad spectral range of 60 nm and regions of vanishing and anomalous dispersion within the transmission band. Finally, it is shown that meta‐waveguide topologies can implement compact resonance‐protected waveguide bends and efficient splitters within just 320 nm propagation length. This work addresses the fundamental challenges of miniaturization, dispersion, and scattering control in integrated photonics and opens new opportunities for enhancing light–matter interactions, interfacing nanophotonic components, and developing nonlinear, ultrafast, and quantum optics resonant on‐chip devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser & Photonics ReviewSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207