MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4352975496 · doi:10.1017/9781846151057.003

The Correspondence of Perchta and Anéžka of Rožmberk ca. 1448–1488

2001· other· en· W4352975496 on OpenAlexaff
John S. Klassen, Lynn Szabo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrotherYardGeologyArchaeologyHistoryPhysicsAstronomyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Anéžka and Perchta of Rožmberk write to their brother Henry of Rožmberk that they look forward to his return and describe their contact with animals in the yard of their castle. Early February, sometime in the 1440s, Český Krumlov Czech AČ , no. 3 Let this letter be given to the noble lord Lord Henry of Rožmberk, our dear brother. We send you our prayers, noble lord, dear brother, and we thank Your Grace very much for the greetings in the packet, and especially for the welcome word that you are returning to us this Shrovetide. Yet everyone looks on the gloomy side [saying] that you will not come. Despite this, we continue to believe that you will not betray us, because if you don’t come, those greetings in the packet do not mean anything. And sister says that the big ox always milks the cows in the sick room, expecting you with milk. And we continue to ask you, for God’s sake, that you return to us at Carnival. Given in Krumlov the Monday after the feast of St. Dorothy [6 February] under the steps leading to the creamery. Anéžka and Perchta of Rožmberk. 2. Betrothal agreement between Ulrich of Rožmberk and John of Lichtenštejn for John to marry Perchta of Rožmberk. It followed Czech custom in which the husband gave one and a half times the amount of the bride’s dowry. The marriage was considered sealed once the couple had shared a bed on the first night . 9 February 1449, Český Krumlov German Listář a listinář , 4, 9–11 We, Ulrich of Rožmberk, acknowledge and make public with this letter that we have made an agreement with the noble lord, Lord John of Lichtenštejn of Mikulov, and have betrothed our daughter, the virgin Perchta, promising to give her as an honorable spouse to him, according to the law of the land of Bohemia. We shall give and want to give as lawful dowry for our daughter, the virgin Perchta, 60,000 good large groschen of Czech Prague coins or the equivalent in Hungarian or Rhine gulden or in good small pennies equal to the value of the aforesaid groschen at that time in the land of Bohemia or Austria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score0.872

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3890.216

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Archaeological StudiesFrench-language works237,207