Estudio numérico de las fluctuaciones de los modos del campo EM en un sistema de percolación 3D
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este trabajo se estudia la radiación del campo producido por nano-emisores desordenados en un clúster de percolación tridimensional (3D). En este trabajo hemos utilizado el conjunto de ecuaciones que acopla a las ecuaciones de Maxwell con los nano-emisores de 4 niveles. Como parámetro de cuantificación de la localización del campo, calculamos la relación de participación inversa (IPR). Se estudia el comportamiento dinámico de la amplitud de campo, generada por emisores incorporados en un clúster con probabilidad de ocupación p en los poros. La simulación numérica se realiza mediante el algoritmo de las diferencias finitas en el dominio del tiempo (FDTD). Los resultados numéricos muestran tiempos específicos donde el campo localizado tiene gran amplitud y una fuerte relación con los niveles alto y bajo de los emisores. El efecto estudiado abre nuevas perspectivas para controlar la localización de campos ópticos en nanotecnologías ópticas modernas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".