Rapid adaptations of Legionella pneumophila to the human host
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Legionella pneumophila are host-adapted bacteria that infect and reproduce primarily in amoeboid protists. Using similar infection mechanisms, they infect human macrophages, and cause Legionnaires’ disease, an atypical pneumonia, and the milder Pontiac fever. We hypothesized that, despite these similarities, the hosts are different enough so that there exist high-selective value mutations that would dramatically increase the fitness of Legionella inside the human host. By comparing a large number of isolates from independent infections, we identified two genes, mutated in three unrelated patients, despite the short duration of the incubation period (2-14 days). One is a gene coding for an outer membrane protein (OMP) belonging to the OmpP1/FadL family. The clinical strain, carrying the mutated OMP homolog, grows faster in macrophages than the wild type strain, and thus appears to be better adapted to the human host. The other is a gene coding for a protein involved in cyclic-di-GMP regulation, which in turn modulates flagellar activity. As human-to-human transmission is very rare, fixation of these mutations into the population and spread into the environment is unlikely. Therefore, convergent evolution – here mutations in the same genes observed in independent human infections – could point to adaptations to the accidental human host. These results suggest that despite its ability to infect, replicate, and disperse from amoebae, L. pneumophila is not well adapted to the human host. Impact statement Legionella pneumophila is primarily infecting amoeboid protists, but occasionally infects human lung macrophages, causing Legionnaires’ disease, an atypical pneumonia. By comparing 171 isolates from patients to their probable environmental source, we identified 119 mutations that presumably occurred in-patient. Among these, several mutations occurred in the gene. In particular, two genes were mutated thrice, significantly more often than expected by chance alone, and are likely to represent adaptations to the human host. We experimentally show that, for one mutation at least, the mutated strain grows faster in human macrophages than in amoebae. By specifically investigating in-patient mutations, we were able to identify two genes that might be involved in human host-specific adaptations of L. pneumophila . This result suggests that L. pneumophila is not particularly well adapted to the human host, as mutations get fixed in-patient, during the short course of an infection (2-14 days), indicating a very high selective value. Data Summary The sequencing data generated in this study are available in the NCBI database under the BioProject accession number: PRJEB52976.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".